On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Herbert Snorrason <odin@anarchism.is> wrote: > > > There's IMO *no point whatsoever* "reinventing" OpenID or try > > competing with OpenID. > Then we disagree on a pretty fundamental level. OpenID is not > acceptable, nor is any protocol which grants the identity provider the > same level of surveillance capability over its users. A combination of > an identity scheme that allows identity providers to monitor everything > and an oligopoly in identities effectively controlled by US-based > corporations (which is the status quo) is especially worrisome to me. > What happens when the U.S. government goes on one of its quasi-regular I read that as "Herbert Snorrason considers an end-user-managed asymmetric cryptography option for identity authentication a non-negotiable acceptance criterion."Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 18:19:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:31 UTC