W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Where is the discussion group for Web Advertising API?

From: Tim Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 02:18:10 +1000
Cc: Shawn Gao <gaohawk@gmail.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <748AB341-4426-4968-AB62-696CC2C16097@gmail.com>
To: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
I actually don’t think you need an API.

Using Linked-Data, it’s possible to provide an ‘offer statement’ in connection to advertising resources.  Advertising in itself is a form of digital product, that’s vended between digital agents. 

Perhaps another function that could be supported via the http://webcredits.org/ currency mechanism, if a means to provide economic carriage for advertising products were to be needed…

In other areas - i believe http://www.iab.net/ provides an array of ‘media standards’. 

Another factor is of course some of the identity related use-cases that may interact with advertising related practices.  I think this needs to be considered in terms of ‘data rights’, which is something i’m working on, but perhaps as a body of work more aligned to identity issues - than web-payments specifically. 

Perhaps - Alternatively, 

DO you have a list of "Advertising API” related use-cases, that you’d like to highlight?

TimH.


On 24 Jul 2014, at 12:47 am, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote:

> I for one would be okay with broadening the scope to include this
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Shawn Gao <gaohawk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, All,
> Maybe this isn't the appropriate place to ask this question. But I am curious there is no group to discuss Web Advertising in W3C. Could anybody tell me there is the right place to discuss adverting API?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Hawk
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sometimes I imply things, or include important information in pictures. Without a request for clarification, I will assume I was clear, which can cause later problems when I wasn't. So please ask me to clarify anything that seems ambiguous. Doing so is not rude. Thank you.
> 


Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 16:22:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:32 UTC