- From: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:34:16 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments@w3.org
Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > I don't see how a sequentially incrementing transaction / message ID > would be different from a nano-second precise datetime value. A specification's demand for a transaction / message ID which is required to be unique and increasing is *much* easier to satisfy in a portable manner than a requirement for “a nano-second precise datetime value.” Greetings, Norbert
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 06:35:20 UTC