- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:15:31 -0400
- To: public-webpaymentsigcharter <public-webpaymentsigcharter@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKcXiSoVTWp8YaEePZP5M6ynjgMHTZESXUGb80=AAzgct_ZShA@mail.gmail.com>
Comment invited... My paper to the April workshop in Paris focused on three attributes of payment. http://www.w3.org/2013/10/payments/papers/ Further discussion and research on this topic (including research in economics and law towards my doctoral dissertation at U Quebec), as well as consideration of various ideas raised on these lists, has led me to include five attributes. Below is a concise (draft) statement of the scope of my dissertation which lists five attributes of payment that are subject to determination either by the payees and payers themselves, or by payments intermediaties and law-makers. The issues raised here are equally relevant to the scope of a W3C payments specification as they are to the model I'm in the process of developing as a free/libre/open extension to MASON > Lagom > regiO [1]. The dissertation work (incl the excerpt below) is licenesed CC-BY 4.0, and all related software components and dependencies are under various free/libre/open works (FLOW) licenses. (What I'm posting here is also dual-licensed now under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement.) I share this for consideration towards the emerging web payments specification, and of course I invite any feedback, advice and collaboration towards the development of the modeling extensions, which can be a useful platform for web payment specification scenarios testing well beyond the particular questions I am focusing on. *** "The present research is concerned with the following compound question in the realm of payments: *Are **fair and efficient market operations, **and** open market system integrity, **enhanced or eroded **whe**n **project managers **are* *free to exercise choice in **specifying* *through **their contracts, **all** attributes of payment? * The scope of this research project is to develop an analytical structure and some extensions to a formal model to test this question in relation to five attributes of payment. Each of the five are identified (underline) and illustrated with sample considerations as follows: 1. *S**cal**ar **quantity* (e.g. 10.99; 0.0001099—*Can the parties * *specify* *micro payments **to **their** chosen** number of decimal places**?*) *Can **contracting **parties **to **implement **algorithmic pricing **to their chosen specifications**? *; 2. *U**nit-of-account* (e.g. $ £ € ¥ etc.—*Are contracting parties free to **price and pay in** their **unit**s* *of choice? **Can the unit** of payment** be **one that is self-defined** by the contracting parties, and/or **can it be from a non-traditional provider**?**)*; 3. *V**alue-in-exchange benchmark* (e.g. WM Reuters Spot Exchange Index; Purchasing Power Parity Index; Commodity Index; Earth Reserve Index, etc.— *Can** contracting parties benchmark **the scalar quantity of **payment to **any** market factors they deem to be relevant **to the **duration** and **object** of the contract**?*); 4. *Transaction** depositories* (eg physical wallet; digital wallet; digital bank account, etc.—*Do contracting parties have the ability to decide **upon and control **the origin and destination nodes for their payments?*); and, 5. *M**edium-of-exchange* (e.g. debit card, credit card, giro, cash, etc.—*Are media-of-exchange options documented effectively to enable informed user choice? Do contracting parties have **practical **access to choice **amongst **medi**a**-of-exchange?*)" Source: Potvin, J. 2014 (Draft, unpub.) Free/Libre/Open World Market Payment: Project Arrangements and Their Emergent Effects. Draft doctoral disseration, Département des sciences administratives, Université du Québec. Email: academic—potj09@uqo.ca; professional—jpotvin@opman.ca [1] MASON http://cs.gmu.edu/~eclab/projects/mason/manual.pdf Lagom http://diva-model.net/fileadmin/ecf-documents/publications/ecf-working-papers/mandel-fuerst-lass-meissner-jaeger__ecf-working-paper_2009-01.pdf regiO http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815213000029 -- Joseph Potvin Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman jpotvin@opman.ca Mobile: 819-593-5983
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2014 17:16:20 UTC