Re: Range of Security : Nonce

On 23 April 2014 02:56, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 04/19/2014 10:49 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > Or is there a downside to those types that I'm just completely blind
> > to?
> >
> > I would be quite happy to use any of those types.  But the "range"
> > of nonce is limited to string.  So if I did so, I would be violating
> > the ontology.
>
> I wouldn't put too much authority into the current vocabulary. If the
> range of nonce in the Security vocabulary is preventing you from getting
> something useful done, we should probably change the acceptable ranges
> for nonce.
>
> Perhaps we should expand it to allow xsd:string, xsd:base64, and
> xsd:hexBinary. Would that work for you, Melvin?
>

Perfect!


>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
>
>