- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:50:44 -0400
- To: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
+1 to Igor's comment. Geography won't protect anyone from the software patents mess. On this topic, see: http://osi.xwiki.com/bin/Projects/draft-flow-syllabus#HConstraintsontheFLOWofIdeas Meanwhile, BIG NEWS coming soon via the CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation case, referenced in the syllabus: http://www.fxweek.com/fx-week/news/2338037/cls-hits-out-at-financial-industry-shakedown-by-alice-corp Joseph Potvin Chair, OSI Working Group on Management Education About Free/Libre/Open Methods, Processes and Governance Operations Manager, The Opman Company jpotvin@opman.ca Mobile: 819-593-5983 On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Igor Schwarzmann <igor@thirdwaveberlin.com> wrote: > On 10 Apr 2014 at 13:29:51, Anders Rundgren (anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com) > wrote: > > > My own take on the strategy thing is skipping North America and the EU since > their > payment systems are extremely dated while the vendors have planted a virtual > mine-field > of patents to make it difficult for possible "newcomers". However, these > patents are > not respected in China, South America, Africa, etc. giving you a lot of > advantages, > not to mention that the market is 5-10 times bigger in terms of users. > > As you probably agree on, such considerations are _way_ outside what a > traditional > SDO like W3C could do. > > > While I agree with your assertion of the status of the US and EU markets, > your statement concerning the other markets, especially Africa, aren't quite > correct. Fragmentation and an accerlated beauracratic apparatus made Africa > fairly difficult as an entry point for newcomers, especially non-local ones. > That's why the big telcos enter the market there by way of buying into it, > not building new things. > > - Igor
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:51:32 UTC