Re: Anonymous digital cash, on top of bitcoin

On 11 November 2013 14:12, Goss, Brian C., M.D. <Goss.Brian@mayo.edu> wrote:

> 80 bytes (*essentially; otherwise it's a 5 page explanation); enough for a
> 64 byte hash and 16 byte UUID.
>

Each block header is part of a timestamp server which is currently 80 bytes
in the reference serialization.  This should be pretty stable as the
timetamp is an unsigned in which will only cycle round next century (2106?)

Ive pretty much modelled 70% of bitcoin using linked data, most importantly
the block chain, but not yet transactions.  I should have this complete,
and compatible with payswarm technology in the next 1-2 weeks...


>
> Brian
>
> > On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:49 AM, "David Nicol" <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I see Bitcoin as primarily a ledger system. Since the bitcoin protocol
> allows additional data to be included in the registered transaction, one
> could layer anything requiring a permanent record on top of it. Transaction
> fees (in BTC) would be the only BTC requirement. After, of course, figuring
> out the details of shoehorning whatever you are wanting to record into the
> available space.
>