- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 21:16:07 +0200
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKuAD-yA8Kg2QUwDhLJF-oGTNs7OK7sAa8ETmfxtnkNzw@mail.gmail.com>
On 6 May 2013 19:13, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > On May 6, 2013, at 10:07, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 6 May 2013 15:46, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > >> Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >>> On 6 May 2013 15:26, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/5/13 5:42 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>>> >>>> Nathan and I were playing around with the ripple.com interface >>>> today >>>> and we discovered that you can use it to issue web based currency based >>>> on >>>> your ripple address. >>>> >>>> We succeeded in getting a trust line going got a transaction into the >>>> ripple ledger at entry 627613. Since ripple requires a 3 letter ISO we >>>> decided to use WEB. Though through the magic of JSON LD I think this >>>> can >>>> be converted to a URI. >>>> >>>> So what it means is that any URI can issue WEB credits. Tie the URI >>>> to a >>>> ripple boostrap via >>>> >>>> <> foaf : account <ripple:r38363268...> >>>> >>>> Which is generally an IFP. Note that the ripple bootstrap is just for >>>> convenience, you can layer on more trust. >>>> >>>> Then use that account to issue a genesis block for how many credits you >>>> wish to issue. >>>> >>>> Then record transactions out of band and use ripple to process netting >>>> as >>>> necessary. >>>> >>>> You will be the steward of your own credits. Whether they are worth >>>> anything or not, will be up to the market! Enjoy! :) >>>> >>>> Wow! >>>> >>>> Talk is no longer cheap :-) >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks :) >>> >>> The only thing that I havent worked out how to do is to destroy the >>> account >>> key after issuing a finite and fixed supply. >>> >>> You could use a notary to do this, I suppose. >>> >>> But how do you know you can trust the notary? >>> >> >> You don't, and you don't issue a finite number, in fact you don't issue >> any more than you can afford. >> >> You fix the price instead. Such that one WEB is always equal to one USD. >> >> Then each person can issue WEB credits backed by them, but they have to >> be willing to redeem WEB credits backed by others. So I can send Kingsley >> one WEB credit, and he can redeem it for $1USD with Melvin, because we all >> trust each other. >> >> If you scale this up, then gateways (like bitstamp, mtgox, btce etc) will >> no doubt trust each other, and trust their users, if a user deposits >> $100USD with them, then they have 100WEB to spend anywhere which has a >> trust path. >> >> Currencies which change in value are no good, we need one which has a >> fixed value in order to make money fluid in, out, and over, the web. >> >> I think that makes sense.. Melvin? >> > > I think people find a fixed supply reassuring. > > > > That's an awesome experiment, but I don't think that a fixed supply is > reassuring. In fact, economists think the opposite. Fixed supplies lead > to deflation. > > See, for example, this well-researched article in The Atlantic [1], where > the author says: > [[ > In other words, Bitcoin has a massive deflationary bias. Its money supply > is mostly fixed, but the menu of things it can buy is growing. The same > amount of money chasing more goods means money will be worth more. Or, put > another way, prices will fall in Bitcoin terms. > > And that's why it's not a currency, and won't be one until it has a > central bank. > > Deflation is toxic for any economy, but particularly for an alternative > one like Bitcoin. No matter what kind of currency we're talking about, > deflation causes hoarding -- why buy something today if you can buy it for > less tomorrow? > ]] > Deflation certainly has demerits. However, inflation is also not without it risks, notably from "black swans" which most economists have a hard time with (hence few saw the 2008 crisis). However, my motivation is to synthesize deflation, but rather, to have a money supply that is strongly resistant to gaming by those with the issuing power. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > [1] > http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/bitcoin-is-no-longer-a-currency/274859/ > > > > I thought the market would decide the value of your WEB credits, rather > than pegging it to the dollar. You could of course offer a dollar to buy > back your IOUs in the market place. > > Maybe if you wanted to write USD IOUs you would just use USD and people > would try and work out how much they trusted you to pay it back? > > >> >> Nathan >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 19:16:36 UTC