Re: [goodrelations] GoodRelations and Web Payments (aka. Payswarm)

Elf, On the topic of GoodRelations and WebPayments, see these postings from
October:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments/2013Oct/0105.html

-- 
Joseph Potvin
Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations
The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman
http://www.projectmanagementhotel.com/projects/opman-portfolio
jpotvin@opman.ca
Mobile: 819-593-5983
LinkedIn (Google short URL): http://goo.gl/Ssp56


On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:20 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

> I've just watched a video by Manu Sporny on generating and registering
> Asset & Listing for Web Payments: http://youtu.be/n5KBw7K65hg
>
> I tried searching http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org for terms
> *asset*, *listing* with no results and payswarm giving just two:
> * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Changelog/20110401
> * http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Events/ISWC2012
>
> I wonder if some way of aligning between Web Payments and GoodRelations
> terms exists?
>
> https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm
> http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html
>
> I also notice gr:PaySwarm as subclass of gr:PaymentMethod in range of
> gr:acceptedPaymentMethods
>
> Wouldn't at least those terms somehow map to each other:
> gr:ProductOrService <-> payswarm:Asset
> gr:Offering <-> payswarm:Listing
>
> GoodRelations terms already got included in schema.org and maybe Web
> Payments could somehow reuse/extend them:
> http://schema.org/Product
> http://schema.org/Offer | http://schema.org/Demand
>
> Otherwise publishers may need to mark things as both?
> Product & Asset
> Offer & Listing
>
> Thanks for help with clarifying it!
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations@ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>




<http://goo.gl/Ssp56>