- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:55:36 -0500
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 12/07/2013 09:58 PM, David Nicol wrote: > 1: it might be possible to shorten the paper by removing some > techinical details. The group position paper does not need to > demonstrate that the group knows its stuff. Good point, I've identified around 4-5 paragraphs that we could cut by doing so. Will do so once I get back around to doing edits. > 2: mention RBC/mintchip as a possible design partner: Bitcoins are > scary, Canadian dollars less so. That's true, although Bitcoin is the elephant in the room and the thing that most people know about wrt. other mechanisms like Ripple, Ven, Open Transactions, etc. > 3: possibly talk up "healthy coopetition" unless that neologism isn't > fun any more Google Trends show it as a stable term, I'll see if I can work it in there. You're right in that the concept is important considering the very wide range of players we're getting interest from wrt. the Web Payments workshop. http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=coopetition -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch http://blog.meritora.com/launch/
Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 03:56:11 UTC