- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:13:49 -0500
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVrjfpF3+pLN4b71kRKU9omDyQXuYYtEVqJ8bZJApKHAAQ@mail.gmail.com>
For reference, Melvin Carvalho posted a link on the list to a video about the future of Bitcoin by Mike Hearn. At the end of the talk (~24:48) Mike mentions that Bitcoin is still centralized, but Ripple is a completely P2P (decentralized) currency exchange. "Mike Hearn on Bitcoin" Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:05 AM >Sorry posted this to wrong list, it was meant to be web payments >Some on the webid list may still find it interest, as it talks about payment workflows between different identities aka 'smart >contracts' :) >https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mD4L7xDNCmA >On 31 March 2013 19:18, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mD4L7xDNCmA On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > I agree, I know a few of the ripple developers and they all assure me that > they just want it critical-bugless before released. > > Put it this way, I trust it enough to hold several hundred thousand XRP > and use it daily and give feedback + submit issues, so I for one trust it. > > > Jeffrey Cliff wrote: > >> It should be pointed out that the so far cloeed components are planned to >> be opened--the system is not yet stable enouhh and they are just trying to >> figure out how to do this in such a way thay they won't likely have to >> reset the ledger afterwards. In the meanwhile it is sensible to not use >> it, given the source isn't finished yet...but the criticism *as a system* >> that it is closed is imho invalid. >> On 2013-04-26 10:40 AM, "Nathan" <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >> >> Manu Sporny wrote: >>> >>> Interesting commentary on Ripple being a scam: >>>> >>>> http://ripplescam.org/ >>>> >>>> #bitcoin #ripple #payswarm #w3c #futureofmoney >>>> >>>> Some of the arguments are fairly weak, I think the underlying assumption >>>> that the author is making is that Ripple is attempting to be Bitcoin (it >>>> isn't, it's a for-profit currency run by a corporation). So, if you >>>> trust Ripple, most of the arguments go away. >>>> >>>> The open source argument is pretty solid, so is the one about hoarding >>>> of XRPs. The OpenCoin developer arguing in the comment thread certainly >>>> didn't help defend Ripple. >>>> >>>> I think the real argument is whether or not Bitcoin is better than >>>> Ripple, and in this case, it completely depends on what you want out of >>>> the currency. Fast transactions? Use Ripple. Decentralized and open >>>> source? Use Bitcoin. >>>> >>>> Any commentary from payment folks on this list? >>>> >>>> Yes! I use both daily, and heavily. >>> >>> There are two things here: >>> a) Ripple as a clearance system. >>> b) Ripple XRP as a currency. >>> >>> Ripple as a clearance system is rather good, it'd be better if it was >>> open >>> source, but it's certainly setting the bar and more than usable (I use it >>> daily). Worst case the rippled project can be reimplemented using the >>> details on the wiki and using the API (which isn't great). The low >>> friction >>> and latency is hard to live without once you are used to it. >>> >>> Another + is that ripple has opensourced some rather good client >>> libraries >>> in Javascript, and lots of tooling for it. >>> >>> Ultimately you cannot directly compare Ripple and Bitcoin directly. You >>> can compare the currencies, in which case there are two ways to compare >>> and >>> value them. >>> >>> 1) Traditionally, where the value of the currency is the amount of trust >>> behind it >>> 2) In ripple case, where XRP is a utility of the network, in which case 1 >>> XRP has the value of 10k-100k transactions depending on how the fees are >>> set. >>> >>> The aside issue, is the distribution of the pre-mined currency. Are they >>> doing this to get rich and get out, or get rich while making things >>> better >>> for the general population. If the first case then that sucks, if the >>> second case then who cares? I'm sure we all hope Satoshi and the original >>> bitcoin pushers are rich today, and likewise I hope the Ripplers will be >>> too. >>> >>> Ultimately, a well defined clearance system similar to ripple, supporting >>> multiple currencies will and should become the norm, ripple is pushing >>> the >>> populations in the right direction. That can't be a bad thing. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Nathan >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Brent Shambaugh I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching how to build distributed economies. Website: http:// <http://bshambaugh.org/experiments/connect_dots3.html> adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 17:14:17 UTC