W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Webkeys, OpenID, WebID, OAuth etc..

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:42:47 -0400
Message-ID: <51753E57.7090600@openlinksw.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 4/21/13 10:30 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> >Keys*can*  have URLs as per the cert ontology.  They can be blank
>> >nodes too, which I think is currently more common.  I use a URL.
> It's Linked Data, you*can*  do anything. The question here is MUST. In
> Web Keys, keys MUST have a URL. That requirement makes it so that you
> can depend on that URL when verifying digital signatures.

Do you have an example of a 5-star Linked Data URI that denotes a public 


1. http://bit.ly/P0HVdI -- post about the virtues of having a URI that 
denotes a public key
-- note the resulting graph honors the Linked Data follow-your-nose pattern
-- vapour report (note: this is rdf/xml specific, we are about to 
release a variant that covers all RDF based Linked Data serialization 
formats which includes JSON-LD).



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 13:43:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:23 UTC