- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:17:52 -0400
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 04/21/2013 09:18 AM, Henry Story wrote: > > ... your initial implementation was not a > WebID over TLS implementation at all. This is false and perhaps even inflammatory at this point. We've had this discussion many times; each time you were disinterested in understanding the implementation we did. However, your disinterest had nothing to do with the technical merits of the implementation or its adherence to how WebID over TLS was described at the time. Our implementation was of a TLS client that used a TLS client-side certificate with an alternate name that was a URL that the authentication server accessed to obtain the same public key in the client-side certificate given during the TLS handshake. -Dave -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2013 18:16:54 UTC