- From: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:49:56 -0500
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>, "public-webpayments@w3.org" <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > Reputation is one generator of trust. If we can come with a common language > we can make reputation more portable. > > That means if you do good in one community it can be more easily recognized > in another. > [........] > I think of trust and currency as different but overlapping problems. I think of fiat currency as a codification of reputation, that starts with the issuing authority. Of course that's reputation on a different spectrum than the reputations that were under discussion, but by allowing formal reputation currencies, what can happen? Of course people can make friends and gain points then sell their points to advertisers who would desire the reach that a good reputation can provide --- so a reputation economy might have a bad reputation among some purists.
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 22:52:40 UTC