- From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:30:27 +0200
- To: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:36 PM, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote: > creation of the UIFA as a transferrable item good > for a best-efforts repayment by Alice the premise of OpenTabs is to not ever transfer a debt to third person, but yeah, i'm aware that most other alternative money systems i've heard of do do that, so the formats we propose in this CG should probably support it. is it good enough to say that the currency on debts (i.e., both on credit transactions and on credit balances between parties) can be a URI?
Received on Saturday, 22 September 2012 06:30:55 UTC