- From: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:56:24 -0500
- To: Andrew Durham <info@andrewdurham.com>
- Cc: Fabio Barone <holon.earth@gmail.com>, public-webpayments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 21:56:52 UTC
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Andrew Durham <info@andrewdurham.com>wrote: > > A complicated game isn't a bad one. In the larger game of competing for available donations, I'm pretty sure (but have no numbers, research, or actual experience with operating corwdfunding platforms -- on the other hand, I did do my share of door-to-door canvassing for donations twenty-odd years ago, and thereby know that sincere gets better results than clever -- with which to augment my certainty) that making the game as simple as possible is preferred, because any additional complication will turn impulse donations away: many donors will switch from "I'm doing what I can to help this cause" to "what is my economic self-interest here?" and close the browser tab.
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 21:56:52 UTC