- From: Andrew Durham <ad@andrewdurham.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:50:55 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments@w3.org
Hi, Manu, Glad you like the idea and wish to allow for it in the code. It is the first time you heard about Cooperative Dominant Assurance Contracts because I just made it up a couple weeks ago! But had you heard about Dr Tabarrock's Dominant Assurance Contracts? I'm very glad to hear that only slight changes in the code are necessary. I understand implementation will not happen now. I just wanted to make sure there is an opening in the code for it to happen later. I assume the logic process for CDAC would exit the existing process into a bunch of new code, then re-enter the existing sequence, then terminate. Is that correct? I am going to study the JSON architecture in the Intents document to see if I can have a rough idea of it and to learn the vocabulary. Andrew On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 21:47, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 02/26/2012 01:49 AM, Andrew Durham wrote: >> >> Cooperative Dominant Assurance Contract >> >> >> I’m pretty sure the rules are free of conflicts (though rule 6 might >> be redundant). I don't grasp the math. And I couldn't describe this >> with game theory or program it. But coming up with it was really >> fun. And it shows a variety of possibilities for future crowdfunding >> that creators of a new system might want it to be able to >> facilitate. > > > This is really neat - first time I have heard of a Cooperative Dominant > Assurance Contract. I followed the links you included and read those as > well... bottom line - I think that this is something that we can (and > should) support in PaySwarm. We would have to modify the Payment Intents > specification slightly, but it would be worth it to support this use case.. > > Keep in mind that we're not too focused on Payment Intents right now, as > we still want to make sure that the base of the system is implemented > and is working properly before building on top of it. However, what you > describe is a very interesting social/financial experiment and I don't > see any reason why the current architecture couldn't support it. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched > http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/ >
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2012 06:23:15 UTC