- From: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:11:56 -0300
- To: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHtLsUVNyr3n_RLv9eGtD8S+XiUXzN_K5r6tMNXRtouwi1fpXA@mail.gmail.com>
I applaud this. It is a very important step. I will try to read through and come with constructive comments. P On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote: > Hi all, > > The modularization discussion of the PaySwarm specification has become > much more of a distraction than I had anticipated. To address this, > let's try splitting the spec along the lines of where we think we might > end up. This will be a headache for the editors of the specifications, > but will hopefully make understanding the key technologies a bit easier. > > The first thing that has been split out of the PaySwarm Web API > specification is how we do public/private key management. The result is > the first (incredibly rough!, pre-alpha!) draft of the Web Keys 1.0 > specification: > > http://payswarm.com/specs/ED/**web-keys/2012-01-23/<http://payswarm.com/specs/ED/web-keys/2012-01-23/> > > The PaySwarm specification will probably endure a few more splits over > the next couple of weeks into the following specs: > > * Payments > * Commerce > * Payment Intents > > I think these splits are roughly along the lines of what Pelle was > suggesting that we do. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/**web-payments-comparison/<http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/> > > -- http://picomoney.com - Like money, just smaller http://stakeventures.com - My blog about startups and agile banking
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 15:12:25 UTC