Re: Web Keys 1.0 spec split from PaySwarm spec

I applaud this. It is a very important step. I will try to read through and
come with constructive comments.

P

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The modularization discussion of the PaySwarm specification has become
> much more of a distraction than I had anticipated. To address this,
> let's try splitting the spec along the lines of where we think we might
> end up. This will be a headache for the editors of the specifications,
> but will hopefully make understanding the key technologies a bit easier.
>
> The first thing that has been split out of the PaySwarm Web API
> specification is how we do public/private key management. The result is
> the first (incredibly rough!, pre-alpha!) draft of the Web Keys 1.0
> specification:
>
> http://payswarm.com/specs/ED/**web-keys/2012-01-23/<http://payswarm.com/specs/ED/web-keys/2012-01-23/>
>
> The PaySwarm specification will probably endure a few more splits over
> the next couple of weeks into the following specs:
>
> * Payments
> * Commerce
> * Payment Intents
>
> I think these splits are roughly along the lines of what Pelle was
> suggesting that we do.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout
> http://manu.sporny.org/2011/**web-payments-comparison/<http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/>
>
>


-- 
http://picomoney.com - Like money, just smaller
http://stakeventures.com - My blog about startups and agile banking