- From: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:50:46 -0500
- To: opentransact@googlegroups.com
- Cc: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHtLsUXAyPRanjbpSBccROiQ5HtBhmhsE-MNQcVt45L_FODx6A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:35 PM, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote: > The draft tipjar.com answer to this is to not support > non-participating currencies at all, beyond allowing people to > register their flavor of chit as a liaison for one. USD, for instance, > is represnted by "tipjar classic" which operates by paper checks > mailed to a post office box, and nothing more modern, by design. Call > that TJUSD. If someone else wants to also liaise for USD, they may, > ideally if PayPal wanted to be very kind to us they would register as > a competing liaison for USD and their symbol would be something like > PPUSD. > It seems more and more like you invented OpenTransact 15 years ago. :D > > maintaining "nostro" accounts and offering each other credit lines on > an external currency that is liased by multiple entities can be done > entirely with currency definition and "give" functionality -- if Alice > gives Bob a 10000 USD credit line, that would be represented as Alice > defining a currency representing credit with Alice and issuing Bob > 10000 USD worth of it. And so on. > > One problem is, that "And so on" might not get spoken to an audience > who can see the "and so on" as a set of trivially collapsing dominoes > leading to wherever. > > It's really quite the impressive magic trick, that all the financial > institutions honor each other's checks, and close to immediately, too. > It is quite amazing. Most people never quite understand all the magic behind it. > > So defining standards, or at least recommendations, for accounts > between trusted liaisons to a common external asset type seems like a > reasonable request. One might call it perhaps the "extension for > federation" and refer to an asset type that is good at any > participating federation member a federated asset > I would absolutely second a federated asset extension to OpenTransact. It might be as simple as having links to accepted assets within the asset meta data element: http://www.opentransact.org/core.html#asset-meta-data These links could be the start of the decentralized ripple like federated asset system. P -- http://picomoney.com - Like money, just smaller http://stakeventures.com - My blog about startups and agile banking
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 19:51:24 UTC