W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments@w3.org > February 2012

Fwd: [sindice-dev] FOAF OnlineEcommerceAccount

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:56:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLesSM0fDQJ8qEXidnY1C-8AGScACMP+bXNeUdet5ubfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
I was thinking about making a term to link a user to their "wallet"
(transfer log).

Recent discussion has shown that Online Ecomerce Account in foaf is not used.

Perhaps we can reuse this rather than inventing a new term?

<#me>  foaf : account
  <wallet URI>
  a foaf : Online Ecommerce Account

in JSON LD something like

@id : "#me"
account : {
  @type : OnlineEcommerceAccount
  title: "My Primary Wallet"

Would this make sense?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Renaud Delbru <renaud.delbru@deri.org>
Date: 6 February 2012 10:42
Subject: Re: [sindice-dev] FOAF OnlineEcommerceAccount
To: sindice-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, foaf-dev Friend of a


The Sindice search engine does return also a similar number of documents (3):


Even if Sindice does not cover all the data on the web, it covers a
representative subset. Therefore, we could say that
foaf:OnlineEcommerceAccount does not seem very used.

Renaud Delbru

On 05/02/12 20:33, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> I just ran the following
>     ?product a<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/OnlineEcommerceAccount>
> }
> With 4 results against sindice.
> http://sparql.sindice.com/sparql?default-graph-uri=&query=SELECT+DISTINCT+*+WHERE+%7B+%0D%0A++++%3Fproduct+a+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2FOnlineEcommerceAccount%3E%0D%0A%7D&format=text%2Fhtml&debug=on
> Would it be safe to say the OnlineEcommerceAccount is not used?
> I'm thinking of a new use for it ...
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 10:03:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:20 UTC