- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:56:13 +0100
- To: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
I was thinking about making a term to link a user to their "wallet"
(transfer log).
Recent discussion has shown that Online Ecomerce Account in foaf is not used.
Perhaps we can reuse this rather than inventing a new term?
<#me> foaf : account
<wallet URI>
a foaf : Online Ecommerce Account
in JSON LD something like
@id : "#me"
account : {
@type : OnlineEcommerceAccount
title: "My Primary Wallet"
}
Would this make sense?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Renaud Delbru <renaud.delbru@deri.org>
Date: 6 February 2012 10:42
Subject: Re: [sindice-dev] FOAF OnlineEcommerceAccount
To: sindice-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, foaf-dev Friend of a
<foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
Hi,
The Sindice search engine does return also a similar number of documents (3):
http://sindice.com/search?q=&nq=*%20%3Crdf%3Atype%3E%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2FOnlineEcommerceAccount%3E&fq=&interface=guru
Even if Sindice does not cover all the data on the web, it covers a
representative subset. Therefore, we could say that
foaf:OnlineEcommerceAccount does not seem very used.
Regards,
--
Renaud Delbru
On 05/02/12 20:33, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
> I just ran the following
>
> SELECT DISTINCT * WHERE {
> ?product a<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/OnlineEcommerceAccount>
> }
>
> With 4 results against sindice.
>
> http://sparql.sindice.com/sparql?default-graph-uri=&query=SELECT+DISTINCT+*+WHERE+%7B+%0D%0A++++%3Fproduct+a+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2FOnlineEcommerceAccount%3E%0D%0A%7D&format=text%2Fhtml&debug=on
>
> Would it be safe to say the OnlineEcommerceAccount is not used?
>
> I'm thinking of a new use for it ...
>
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 10:03:09 UTC