- From: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:48:05 -0300
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, opentransact@googlegroups.com
- Cc: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHtLsUWLsQRbk7C5qBWPNTuGHhzcXhKKEjND14W6r=H85_aJYg@mail.gmail.com>
I just wrote a piece on it here: http://payglo.be/2012/04/05/mintchip/ I really don't see it as being useful for e-commerce apps. Some of their technical choices make it impossible to do so at scale. However I do see various niches that it could be useful in. P On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote: > "Today's digital economy is changing faster than ever, and currency has > to change too. It is, introducing MintChip, from the Royal Canadian Mint > - the evolution of currency. > > MintChip brings all the benefits of cash into the digital age. Instant, > private and secure, MintChip value can be stored and moved quickly and > easily over email, software applications, or by physically tapping > devices together." > > http://developer.**mintchipchallenge.com/<http://developer.mintchipchallenge.com/> > > I was a bit floored that this is something that a government body is > doing - go Canada! Upon a cursory look, it seems as if it is a > pseudo-competitor to Bitcoin, except that it's centralized. I find it > questionable that the hardware device is secure, or if that's even a > good idea. I don't like the idea of carrying around more than $300 with > me at any given time - that transactions are non-reversible is > problematic. You get mugged, you loose your digital cash... digital cash > should be better than physical cash... not have the same problems. > > Merchants hate credit card charge-backs, but it's also a pretty > pro-customer feature of modern monetary systems. The technological > underpinnings of MintChip look solid, but it still seems limited to > digital cash only. That is, no digital receipts, no credit mechanism, no > crowd-funding mechanism, etc. The fact that it isn't tied to the > Canadian dollar is a bad move. Alternative currencies have a huge > crossing-the-chasm disadvantage: nobody accepts it until it becomes > popular, it doesn't become popular because nobody accepts it. So, I > expect it to languish unless it is tied directly to a fiat currency. > That would be fairly easy to do with the political will. Understandably, > the RCM is moving slowly on this one. > > I think their cloud-based approach is a better solution, but the problem > with that is still the non-support of charge-backs. Also - they haven't > documented any part of the technological protocol that I could see - bad > form, hope they explain how the system works (in a patent and > royalty-free way). In any case, glad to see government dabbling in this > sort of technology. > > Thoughts? > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched > http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/**02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/<http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/> > > -- http://picomoney.com - Like money, just smaller http://stakeventures.com - My blog about startups and agile banking
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 15:48:37 UTC