Re: [w3c/payment-request] Spec is silent on its role in facilitating arbitrary communication between top level contexts (#936)

To round this out, based on the reactions to the [comment above](https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/936#issuecomment-767029143) I think we've reached alignment. 

Introducing a normative dependency from Payment Request API to the Payment Handler API is not the correct approach, and the [example additional text](https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/936#issuecomment-766918305) proposed sets an appropriate mitigation requirement for any payment handler (beyond just the Payment Handler API, as described above).



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/936#issuecomment-767453662