- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:32:35 -0700
- To: w3c/payment-handler <payment-handler@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/payment-handler/pull/365/review/394635128@github.com>
@ianbjacobs commented on this pull request. > @@ -2438,10 +2438,19 @@ <h2> </h2> <ul> <li>One goal of this specification is to minimize the user - interaction required to make a payment. At the same time, user agents - must not permit combinations of configurations that would enable - invoking Web sites to invoke payment request and receive payments - silently. + interaction required to make a payment. However, we also want to + ensure that the user has an opportunity to consent to making a + payment. Because payment handlers are not required to open windows + for user interaction, user agents should take necessary steps to + provide for some form of user action before <a data-cite= + "payment-request#show-method">PaymentRequest.show()</a> resolves. For + example, a user agent might do nothing if a payment handler opens a + window and the user has an opportunity to confirm a transaction via a + button. But if the payment handler does not open a window, or opens a + window without an opportunity for user interaction, the browser might + prompt the user to confirm the payment handler's behavior before I look forward to hearing from @romandev, @rsolomakhin, and @danyao on that idea. If we adopt something like that, then this text would become something like "The reason we have that event is to prevent the scenario where...". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-handler/pull/365#discussion_r409558009
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2020 13:32:49 UTC