W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments-specs@w3.org > May 2019

Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Don't redact phone number from billingAddress (#80)

From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 07:27:46 -0700
To: w3c/payment-method-basic-card <payment-method-basic-card@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/payment-method-basic-card/pull/80/c492261106@github.com>

Would this work as a proposal:

1) redactList for Basic Card billingAddress response is "organization" and "recipient." You never get those for billingAddress.

2) With the pull request 866 proposal, by default phone is not returned, but the merchant can explicitly request it.

3) We can mention in a privacy and security consideration that the payment handler can offer the user a configuration where phone is not returned in the billingAddress.

Note that this proposal does not mention 'requestPayerPhone' and relies instead on the future functionality of 866.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2019 14:28:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 14 May 2019 14:28:09 UTC