- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:52:40 -0800
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/payment-request/pull/812/review/196243381@github.com>
domenic requested changes on this pull request. Can you separate the editorial changes (removing lots of `data-lt`s) from the normative ones, to make this easier to review? I think I found the big normative change and the issue with it, but it's hard to tell what else might be there. > </li> - <li>Add the tuple (<var>paymentMethod</var>.<a data-lt= - "PaymentMethodData.supportedMethods">supportedMethods</a>, - <var>serializedData</var>) to - <var>serializedMethodData</var>. + <li>Append <var>paymentMethod</var> to + <var>paymentMethods</var>. So the problem with not storing the JSON serialized version is that the JSON serialization now becomes meaningless. Consider the following: ```js const bcr1 = { supportedNetworks: new Set("foo", "bar") }; ``` With the new spec, the JSON-serialization will be `{ "supportedNetworks": {} }`. But the value stored in _paymentMethods_ will be `{ supportedNetworks: ["foo", "bar"] }` since Web IDL dictionary conversion converts all iterables to sequences. This means that if someone, e.g., passed the JSON serialization across a process boundary and used it to attempt to reconstruct the result on the other side, they would not be able to match the spec. I thought our original spec was motivated exactly by that design. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/812#pullrequestreview-196243381
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2019 20:53:02 UTC