Thursday, 31 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Spec hasEnrolledInstrument (#830)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Spec hasEnrolledInstrument (#830)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Providing an `AbortSignal` instead of calling .abort() (#757)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Do .data IDL conversion in constructor (#829)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Do .data IDL conversion in constructor (#829)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Modifiers and [[serializedModifierData]] not actually used anywhere. (#753)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Spec hasEnrolledInstrument (#830)
Wednesday, 30 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Do .data IDL conversion in constructor (#829)
- [w3c/payment-request] Spec hasEnrolledInstrument (#830)
- [w3c/payment-handler] Rename canMakePayment* hasEnrolledInstrument (#332)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
Tuesday, 29 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- [w3c/payment-handler] Add a privacy consideration note for issue #330. (#331)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- [w3c/payment-request] Do .data IDL conversion in constructor (#829)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Do .data IDL conversion in constructor (#828)
- [w3c/payment-request] Modifiers (#828)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Disable Payment Request API in CSP/iframe sandbox (#698)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integration with Feature Policy (#600)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
Monday, 28 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
Friday, 25 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Integrate with Feature Policy (#822)
Thursday, 24 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove regionCode attribute (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove regionCode attribute (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove regionCode attribute (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
Wednesday, 23 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
Tuesday, 22 January 2019
- [w3c/payment-handler] CanMakePaymentEvent handling algorithm unclear (#330)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: reworded examples, nits (#827)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove regionCode attribute (doesn't spark joy) (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove regionCode attribute (doesn't spark joy) (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentAddress 'region' inconsistencies (#663)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentAddress 'region' inconsistencies (#663)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
Monday, 21 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
Friday, 18 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Extensibility of PaymentResponse.complete(result) (#817)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Attach 'payment request is showing boolean' to top-level browsing context (#811)
Thursday, 17 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Leave Off Unneeded Information (#5)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact more things from billingAddress (#65)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove PaymentAddress' regionCode attribute (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove PaymentAddress' regionCode attribute (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove PaymentAddress' regionCode attribute (#823)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] consider requiring an error (non-empty dict) for .retry()? (#792)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification question for `show()` algorithm (#820)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Prepare for Proposed Recommendation (#56)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Generate an implementation report (#54)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Generate an implementation report (#54)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Fix link to implementation report (#58)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Fix link to implementation report (#58)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(w3c): small update to w3c json (#59)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(w3c): small update to w3c json (#59)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Updated per Dom Hazael-Massieux (#826)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Updated per Dom Hazael-Massieux (#826)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Updated per Dom Hazael-Massieux (#826)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Removed deprecated shortname field (#66)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Removed deprecated shortname field (#66)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Removed deprecated shortname field (#66)
- [w3c/payment-method-id] Json update (#59)
- [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Removed deprecated shortname field (#66)
- [w3c/payment-request] Updated per Dom Hazael-Massieux (#826)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] updated per DHM (#329)
- [w3c/payment-handler] updated per DHM (#329)
Wednesday, 16 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Attach 'payment request is showing boolean' to top-level browsing context (#811)
- [w3c/payment-method-id] Fix link to implementation report (#58)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] test suite that checks whether shipping options can be updated (#791)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] test suite that checks whether shipping options can be updated (#791)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Some clarifications with Payment Request API (#774)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Some clarifications with Payment Request API (#774)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] consider requiring an error (non-empty dict) for .retry()? (#792)
- [w3c/payment-request] Clarify retry() when errorFields are not passed (#825)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Disable Payment Request API in CSP/iframe sandbox (#698)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Rethink "payment request is showing" boolean (#809)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Attach 'payment request is showing boolean' to top-level browsing context (#811)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Attach 'payment request is showing boolean' to top-level browsing context (#811)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
Tuesday, 15 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact more things from billingAddress (#65)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Attach 'payment request is showing boolean' to top-level browsing context (#811)
- Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact more things from billingAddress (#65)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#824)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: convert PaymentMethodData.data (#812)
- [w3c/payment-request] Remove PaymentAddress' regionCode attribute (#823)
- [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: relationship to Feature Policy spec (#822)
Monday, 14 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Confirm tests and specs align (#779)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Confirm tests and specs align (#779)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Support for language the form is served (#819)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Support for language the form is served (#819)
Friday, 11 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- [w3c/payment-request] fix: close request if sheet is showing (#821)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification question for `show()` algorithm (#820)
Thursday, 10 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification question for `show()` algorithm (#820)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification question for `show()` algorithm (#820)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Attach 'payment request is showing boolean' to top-level browsing context (#811)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify when the user can abort the payment request algorithm (#796)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify when the user can abort the payment request algorithm (#810)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify when the user can abort the payment request algorithm (#810)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarify when the user can abort the payment request algorithm (#796)
Wednesday, 9 January 2019
Tuesday, 8 January 2019
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should we put `regionCode` attribute at risk? (#816)