- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 23:26:16 -0800
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/payment-request/issues/796/439795493@github.com>
Ok, just want to clarify something here... as I alluded to above, there are two cases we need to deal with: 1. `updateWith()` / `retry()` - use same update logic. 1. Before `complete()` is called (i.e., "...processing...") stage. About 2, the spec says (my emphasis): > After the payment request has been accepted and the `PaymentResponse` returned to the caller but before the caller calls `complete()` the payment request user interface remains in a pending state. At this point **the user interface ought not offer a cancel command** because acceptance of the payment request has been returned. So, at I mentioned above: * Chrome allows the user to abort on 2 by pressing "esc". * Firefox does not provide any way to abort. * Edge? @zouhir? * Safari? @aestes? The annoying part of 2 is that it can get stuck (hence the timeout): > For this reason, implementations MAY impose a timeout for developers to call complete(). If the timeout expires then the implementation will behave as if complete() was called with no arguments. I think we can all agree that cancelling during 1 should be ok. So, question is, should a user be allowed to cancel by prior to calling `.complete()`? It should it be _only_ by timeout (in which case, Chrome might be accidentally doing it wrong) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/796#issuecomment-439795493
Received on Monday, 19 November 2018 07:26:38 UTC