Hi all,
One of the reasons to move to a URL-based payment method identifier would be to allow the payment method owner to whitelist payment handlers.
It is also possible that we could keep it as an open payment method, with the expectation that different implementations (on the network side) will mint their own payment method identifiers, but all reuse the specified data and processing model.
Ian
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization/issues/54