- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 13:42:35 -0700
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/payment-request/pull/752/review/135583915@github.com>
domenic approved this pull request. LGTM with nits editorially. Unsure on consensus status. > @@ -3213,6 +3213,28 @@ <h2> <li>Set <var>response</var>.<a>[[\retryPromise]]</a> to <var>retryPromise</var>. </li> + <li data-link-for="PaymentValidationErrors">If + <var>errorFields</var>'s <a>paymentMethod</a> member was passed, and "was passed" -> "is present" > @@ -3213,6 +3213,28 @@ <h2> <li>Set <var>response</var>.<a>[[\retryPromise]]</a> to <var>retryPromise</var>. </li> + <li data-link-for="PaymentValidationErrors">If + <var>errorFields</var>'s <a>paymentMethod</a> member was passed, and + if required by the specification that defines <var>response</var>'s + <a>payment method</a>, then <a data-cite= + "!WEBIDL#dfn-convert-ecmascript-to-idl-value">convert</a> + <var>errorFields</var> <a>paymentMethod</a> to an IDL value. + Otherwise, <a data-cite= Unsure whether this buys anything, versus just ignoring it. Maybe it's useful for web-based payment handlers?? > @@ -3213,6 +3213,28 @@ <h2> <li>Set <var>response</var>.<a>[[\retryPromise]]</a> to <var>retryPromise</var>. </li> + <li data-link-for="PaymentValidationErrors">If + <var>errorFields</var>'s <a>paymentMethod</a> member was passed, and + if required by the specification that defines <var>response</var>'s + <a>payment method</a>, then <a data-cite= + "!WEBIDL#dfn-convert-ecmascript-to-idl-value">convert</a> + <var>errorFields</var> <a>paymentMethod</a> to an IDL value. Maybe "to an IDL value of the type specified there" or similar? > @@ -3273,6 +3296,14 @@ <h3> Represents validation errors with the <a>PaymentResponse</a>'s <a>shippingAddress</a>. </dd> + <dt> + <dfn>paymentMethod</dfn> member + </dt> + <dd> + A payment method specific error. See, for example, Singular -> plural? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/752#pullrequestreview-135583915
Received on Monday, 9 July 2018 20:42:58 UTC