Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Only allows instrument.set() in active service worker (#224) from Jinho Bang on 2018-02-15 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from February 2018)

From: Jinho Bang <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 01:24:25 -0800
To: w3c/payment-handler <payment-handler@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/payment-handler/pull/224/c365869446@github.com>

> The proposed text seems fine, but does this also apply to things like IndexedDB?

If my understanding is correct, IndexedDB storage is not associated with a service worker.
We might compare it with CacheStorage, BackgroundSync, and Push rather than IndexedDB.

The following link will be helpful to us:
  - https://github.com/WICG/BackgroundSync/issues/101

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-handler/pull/224#issuecomment-365869446

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 09:25:00 UTC