@stpeter, Previously in this task force we looked at encompassing more token types. However, based on discussions with organizations that create opaque tokens for merchants, we concluded it was unlikely that they would move that functionality into payment handlers. Consequently, the scope of the work became more clearly "issuer tokens." This also relates to issue #27, but @adrianhopebailie's review was of an outdated draft. I think at this point we should really focus on issuer tokens. I believe that includes seeing whether various *Pay systems could leverage the work rather than use proprietary approaches. Ian -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization/issues/16#issuecomment-365340426
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2018 17:28:25 UTC