Wednesday, 28 February 2018
- [w3c/3ds] 3DS response data above and beyond token data (#3)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Indicate to the payment handler whether the user agent showed payment sheet? (#250)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Indicate to the payment handler whether the user agent showed payment sheet? (#250)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Indicate to the payment handler whether the user agent showed payment sheet? (#250)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add exclusionList for PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add way to update `total` and `displayItems` after `.show()` but before user interaction (#645)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] test: link to shipping option test (#688)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] test: link to shipping option test (#688)
- [w3c/payment-request] test: link to shipping option test (#688)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
Tuesday, 27 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Indicate to the payment handler whether the user agent showed payment sheet? (#250)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Indicate to the payment handler whether the user agent showed payment sheet? (#250)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add type to PaymentItem (#163)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add type to PaymentItem (#163)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add regionCode and exclusionList to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Standardize phone number format (#652)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Standardize phone number format (#652)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add constructor to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add constructor to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add constructor to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
Monday, 26 February 2018
Thursday, 22 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add contact info / support URL to show() method? (#687)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: allow show() to take optional detailsPromise (#672)
- [w3c/payment-request] Add contact info / support URL to show() method? (#687)
Wednesday, 21 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
Tuesday, 20 February 2018
- [w3c/payment-request] Unknown currencySystem should throw (#686)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Merchant-specified default shipping address (#653)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Merchant-specified default shipping address (#653)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
Friday, 16 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
Thursday, 15 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: adds PaymentItemType enum and PaymentItem.type (#666)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add localization hint for payment sheet (#656)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Allow locale to be specified by the developer. (#650)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add constructor to PaymentAddress (#654)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Merchant-specified default shipping address (#653)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Consider Cleartext JWS (#5)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Consider Cleartext JWS (#5)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Required or recommended encryption algorithms (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Only allows instrument.set() in active service worker (#224)
- [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Consider Cleartext JWS (#5)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Required or recommended encryption algorithms (#2)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Only allows instrument.set() in active service worker (#224)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Only allows instrument.set() in active service worker (#224)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] interaction with payment methods doesn't appear to be defined (#249)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentShippingOption as a subclass of DisplayItem (#681)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentShippingOption as a subclass of DisplayItem (#681)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Please include example of TokenizedCardResponse (#34)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] interaction with payment methods doesn't appear to be defined (#249)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
Tuesday, 13 February 2018
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
Tuesday, 13 February 2018
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
- [w3c/payment-handler] interaction with payment methods doesn't appear to be defined (#249)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
Tuesday, 13 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Where does tokenisation occur in the the flow - and do we care (#16)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Where does tokenisation occur in the the flow - and do we care (#16)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Where does tokenisation occur in the the flow - and do we care (#16)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] What does "EMV-like security" mean? (#28)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] What does "EMV-like security" mean? (#28)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Where does tokenisation occur in the the flow - and do we care (#16)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] FR: 3DS (#685)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] FR: 3DS (#685)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] FR: 3DS (#685)
- [w3c/payment-request] FR: 3DS (#685)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: describe security mitigations #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial to address #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Feat: add constructor to PaymentAddress (#654)
Monday, 12 February 2018
- [w3c/payment-request] Define handling of multiple applicable modifiers (#684)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- [w3c/payment-request] Editorial to address #675 (#683)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] canMakePayment() needs to match .show() (#535)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] "User accepts the payment request algorithm" needs to clarify where Payment Handlers are invoked (#476)
- [w3c/payment-request] Align show() and canMakePayment() language #535 (#682)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Only allows instrument.set() in active service worker (#224)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] What happens when clearing site data? (#236)
Friday, 9 February 2018
Thursday, 8 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Payment Method declaration may show duplicate card descriptions (#9)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Payment Method declaration may show duplicate card descriptions (#9)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Need for environment parameter (#19)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Need for environment parameter (#19)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] What to do if tokenized data looks like basic card data? (#21)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] What to do if tokenized data looks like basic card data? (#21)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] PaymentInstruments .set() and icons (#233)
Wednesday, 7 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentShippingOption as a subclass of DisplayItem (#681)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentShippingOption as a subclass of DisplayItem (#681)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Use payment method manifest for registration-time validation? (#248)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] PaymentShippingOption as a subclass of DisplayItem (#681)
- [w3c/payment-request] PaymentShippingOption as a subclass of DisplayItem (#681)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Use payment method manifest for registration-time validation? (#248)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
Tuesday, 6 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Use payment method manifest for registration-time validation? (#248)
- [w3c/payment-handler] Use payment method manifest for registration-time validation? (#248)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add way to update `total` and `displayItems` after `.show()` but before user interaction (#645)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Proposal: Remove requestPermission() (#246)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] Token properties? (#25)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Proposal: Remove requestPermission() (#246)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Editorial: Replace site with origin; mark as informative (#245)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Only allows instrument.set() in active service worker (#224)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Editorial: Replace site with origin; mark as informative (#245)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
- [w3c/payment-request] Guidance on shipping options (mostly for devs) (#680)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Proposal: Remove requestPermission() (#246)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Document privacy and security mitigations (#675)
- [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Add reference to RFC 7516 (#4)
- [w3c/webpayments-crypto] More detailed encryption workflow (#3)
Monday, 5 February 2018
- [w3c/webpayments-crypto] Required or recommended encryption algorithms (#2)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-crypto] What public key formats are acceptable, and any constraints? (#1)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Is paypment request gated behind https? (#658)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Is paypment request gated behind https? (#658)
- Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Proposal: Remove requestPermission() (#246)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Document privacy and security mitigations (#675)
- Re: [w3c/payment-request] Is paypment request gated behind https? (#658)
- [w3c/payment-handler] work in progress: simplification of various things (#247)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)
Sunday, 4 February 2018
- Re: [w3c/3ds] Some high-level issues to discuss (#2)
- Re: [w3c/3ds] 3DS 2.0 specificities by schema (#1)