Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization] What are the supportedCryptogramTypes? (#47) from ianbjacobs on 2018-08-31 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from August 2018)

From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:10:08 +0000 (UTC)
To: w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization <webpayments-methods-tokenization@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization/issues/47/417731216@github.com>

I have begun to hear back from people a preference that the approach taken by the pull request (#49) to tie cryptogram types to network-supported types should work.

I hear some agreement to focus on "full cryptograms". I also note that dynamic CVV can be used with Basic Card. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-tokenization/issues/47#issuecomment-417731216

Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 17:10:30 UTC