- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 06:38:10 -0700
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2018 13:39:11 UTC
@marcoscaceres I don't think you need to change the PRs but perhaps there is a need to add something that shows how a PaymentHandler may cause the `Payer address changed algorithm` to be invoked (when a user provides a billing address through interaction with the PaymentHandler). **Q:** Are you suggesting the spec text that describes how a Payment Handler might invoke the `Payer address changed algorithm` doesn't belong in the PaymentRequest but rather in the PaymentHandler spec? **Push Payments and `retry()`*** The underlying issue related to push payments is not with Billing Address but with `retry()`. It is too late to call `retry()` if the payment handler has already completed the payment. So, while a Billing Address issue may be one reason to call `retry()` it's not the root of the issue. I don't think `retry()` is a good idea and I think what @ianbjacobs and @rsolomakhin are attempting to do is find a flow that avoids needing it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/27#issuecomment-412874503
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2018 13:39:11 UTC