Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should API support billing address capture (for tax computation)? (#27)

@ianbjacobs: 
> @rsolomakhin and I discussed this further today and I anticipate he will write up something sensible when time permits. At a high level, we discussed this type of flow which is a better experience than the one I had in mind.

I don't understand how this is different from what I had proposed in the pull request? Could you please  comment on the pull request? It seems like a waste of time for @rsolomakhin to have to redo what I already worked on? I don't see anything in your points that my pull request didn't already do. 

The only difference from the points above is that there event was sent to the PaymentRequest (`.onpayerdetailchange`), instead of the `onpaymentmethodchange`, but that's just a detail.   

Wrote @adrianhopebailie: 
> @marcoscaceres the key difference with push is that by the time the website gets the PaymentResponse the payment is complete.

Sure. I get that part. 

> Compared with BasicCard, for example, the merchant has nothing more to do but mark the sale as complete. The payment is already done.

I'm still not following :( 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/27#issuecomment-412743487