- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 00:17:34 -0700
- To: w3c/webpayments-methods-card <webpayments-methods-card@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments-methods-card/pull/23/review/39943264@github.com>
marcoscaceres requested changes on this pull request. > @@ -180,6 +185,22 @@ </p> </section> + + <section> + <h3>Processing incoming payment method data</h3> + + <p>When the PaymentRequest API is to pass data to a payment app supporting basic-card as part + of the <a>paymentRequest.show()</a> algorithm, the payment app must process any non-null Also, it's not just .show(), it's also, "canMakePayment()" > @@ -222,6 +243,14 @@ </dl> </section> + + <section> + <h3>Providing outgoing payment responses</h3> + + <p>When the <a>user accepts the payment request algorithm</a> runs in the context of a + payment app supporting basic-card, the payment app must provide back the relevant data in a + <code>BasicCardResponse</code> dictionary.</p> nit: s/`<code>`/`<a>` > @@ -222,6 +243,14 @@ </dl> </section> + + <section> + <h3>Providing outgoing payment responses</h3> + + <p>When the <a>user accepts the payment request algorithm</a> runs in the context of a + payment app supporting basic-card, the payment app must provide back the relevant data in a + <code>BasicCardResponse</code> dictionary.</p> Is there a chance that converting from a random app to a BasicCardResponse would fail? If so, should we reject? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-card/pull/23#pullrequestreview-39943264
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2017 07:18:21 UTC