- From: Anders Rundgren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 21:39:32 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/484@github.com>
This issue is for the record only since it addresses the actual API _concept_ rather than details. FWIW, I'm developing a (native) payment app which essentially works as a traditional payment terminal but with integrated "virtual" cards. In payment terminals you authorize a transaction request but that is not equivalent to tearing down the UI (which <code>complete()</code> appears to assume), it is rather put in a waiting state: ![working](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8044211/24388177/37a71294-1379-11e7-988a-b954e475fc87.gif) It also possible that the waiting state is terminated by something else than success. Here is an authentic example of what the payment terminal prototype can come up with: ![rba2](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8044211/24388519/90925c54-137b-11e7-90cb-f8bc0d3de84f.png) In this case the application's _internal_ authorization process is _restarted_ because the RBA (Risk Based Authentication) information above is included in the authorization message as well. All of this happen in the context of a _single_ invocation by the merchant. For a more technical description of the flow, you may take a peek at: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-credit-transfer-direct-debit/issues/42#issuecomment-289415093 That for example Android Pay doesn't need this kind of operation is because it is rather a "card emulator" than a payment terminal. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/484
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 04:40:07 UTC