- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 06:36:05 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 20 March 2017 13:36:39 UTC
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 12:25 am, ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > @marcoscaceres, > > You wrote "it needs a little overhaul tho." > > That would be great. Can that be done for discussion on Thursday? > Maybe... what I have in mind doesn't change how it works. Just a bit more precise. > At the payment manifest discussion this week I'd like to talk about the > dependencies (PR API and payment method manifest) and whether, for example, > where the additional third party payment app matching semantics implied by the manifest > file are specified. > We can probably have those discussions without needing any spec changes. > Ian > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. > -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/464#issuecomment-287760492
Received on Monday, 20 March 2017 13:36:39 UTC