- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:27:53 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/payment-method-id <payment-method-id@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 24 July 2017 13:28:48 UTC
Hi @marcoscaceres, I am thinking we may want to be more explicit in cautionary statements to payment method owners. Here is the sort of flow I have in mind: For user agents: * It is optional for user agents to fetch PMIs. (I think in your proposal you can drop " As <a>URL-based payment method identifiers</a> serve primarily as identifiers (and not a linked resource), ") * The Working Group is developing a payment method manifest specification that will give payment method owners greater control over the ecosystem of payment apps that implement their payment method. * In the absence of a manifest or of broadly deployed implementations of one or more manifest specifications, payment method owners are unlikely to -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-id/pull/40#issuecomment-317422075
Received on Monday, 24 July 2017 13:28:48 UTC