Re: [w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api] Multiple payment apps per origin (#98)

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 1:12 am, ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> We had lonnnnnnnng discussions about how to talk about this work with people. We did not like the term "digital wallet" as it is overloaded. We chose "payment app" to say "The software that you pay with". We have invested a lot in the phrase "payment app" for communications purposes and I would not throw it out lightly.
> 

You don't need to. No spec talks about "progressive web apps", for instance; yet we have a good understanding of the tech that comes together to form them. 

So please don't mix marketing and communication with normative prose - that just makes for really bad times - and it's clear to see how it's already led to poor design choices in this spec (the manifest duplication). 

> Ian
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
> 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/98#issuecomment-274816502

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 14:26:41 UTC