Re: [w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api] Payment app identifier to manifest filename mapping (#48)

@jakearchibald,

> A "user agent-based payment app" should be registered via a service worker (unless there's good reason to do something else), as this is how it's done with every other sw-based API. Is there consensus on this?

Yes, that's how the work has been proceeding and it's my understanding that there's consensus on it.

I'll let others respond in more detail to your comments on displaying/getting recommended apps installed (I think you've got the right idea in general though), but I did want to say ...

> Once this is done it could signal completion somehow (sorry that's a bit hand-wavy, but I guess there'll be something similar in place for when the payment app needs to show UI for login & confirmation).

I believe this may be related to whatever we come up with in #73, so I wanted to link to it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/48#issuecomment-273208618

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:53:04 UTC