- From: rvm4 <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 10:33:02 -0800
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 18:33:39 UTC
We appear to use "?" and "optional" interchangeably to signify nullability in this webIDL definition. Is that intentional or should I convert the whole thing to one way or the other? You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413 -- Commit Summary -- * Take paymentRequestID in constructor -- File Changes -- M index.html (8) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413.patch https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 18:33:39 UTC