[w3c/browser-payment-api] Take paymentRequestID in constructor (#413)

We appear to use "?" and "optional" interchangeably to signify nullability in this webIDL definition. Is that intentional or should I convert the whole thing to one way or the other?
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413

-- Commit Summary --

  * Take paymentRequestID in constructor

-- File Changes --

    M index.html (8)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413.patch
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/413