Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should PaymentItems have a type? (#163)

@rsolomakhin, respectfully, that seems to add a fair bit of redundancy. For example, "shipping" is already derived from the selected shipping option. It also limits the display of things (e.g., tax) to a single item, but there might be multiple taxes being applied (e.g., a "GST" and some random state tax). That's why I think just having the type specifically on the `displayItem` might work better... can also probably live without the "sub total", even though it's shown in the screenshot I provided.  


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/163#issuecomment-349534999