> that would (IMHO) not return an exhaustive response. We don't need exhausting, but we need somewhat representative and a few "yeah, we totally need this! We are currently hacking around this limitation with X". "X" is critical to the discussion to motivate any standardization. If there is no "X" today, then it's too early to be discussing standardization. We can also ask on the mailing list, if the community is not on GitHub. > I would rather engage the members by asking: ... 👍, email the WG. > BTW, how is PayPal supposed to work in this context? We will find out really soon: they are working on a prototype with Google. Waiting to hear what they need. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-basic-card/issues/38#issuecomment-319618046
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2017 09:21:57 UTC