Re: [w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api] Issue marker cleanup (#133)

@marcoscaceres wrote:

   > In the spec, we always wait until at least one another implementer has a chance to review and 
   > approve the changes. Preferably, we should have two reviewers who are experts in whatever is    
   > being added/modified doing the review.

I'm ok with that moving forward but that is not what we had previously agreed to to get to FPWD.

  > Immature things should never go in the spec: only in branches, which after a lot of review and 
  > iterations go into the spec. That's how we've been doing for the PR spec.

I'm fine to do that once we get to FPWD. 

 > Let's switch to using the same process as the PR spec

Is there documentation?

Ian


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/133#issuecomment-294301673

Received on Saturday, 15 April 2017 15:55:05 UTC