Hi all, I think we should review the editorial process, especially, @marcoscaceres, if you become an active editor. My understanding of what we are doing to get to FPWD is mostly cleanup and putting issue markers in the spec. I would not characterize what we are doing as adding things on a whim. Once we get to FPWD, and as implementations increase, we may well want to adjust our process. I think there is strong agreement that there should be review before substantive additions. Let's figure out (after FPWD) how to do that effectively. I also would like to make a pitch for the ability to fix obvious editorial bugs without review, at least until the spec is much more mature. My goal right now is to stabilize the spec in its current form to get to FPWD, as we agreed at the FTF meeting. I have no other edits planned, but imagine there may be some small changes based on next Tuesday's discussion. Ian -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/133#issuecomment-294297785
Received on Saturday, 15 April 2017 14:48:21 UTC