We have strayed from the original issue, so I have started a new issue for @mattsaxon with a proposal for discussion:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-card/issues/29
Meanwhile, for this issue, I think we should:
1) My my proposed editorial tweak:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-card/issues/26#issuecomment-290087157
2) Adopt this approach: "Leave the WebIDL as is, but state that if an implementation of BasicCard has a value for a BasicCardResponse field, it SHOULD return it."
Ian
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-card/issues/26#issuecomment-291258436
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 20:09:40 UTC