- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:12:13 -0700
- To: w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers <webpayments-method-identifiers@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 September 2016 22:13:08 UTC
> It seems we can advance the specification without needing a registry (beyond the definition in the spec). > It may be useful independently to register the strings in one more more registrations. (And more investigation would need to happen to determine there's a value in doing so.) +1 , but I will add that we have ignored, up to now that there is already a registry that we COULD just use where the short-strings are implied to be the fragments on a http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1 base URL ... * http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#VISA * http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#ByInvoice * http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#COD -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/issues/13#issuecomment-246511658
Received on Monday, 12 September 2016 22:13:08 UTC