- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:37:13 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers <webpayments-method-identifiers@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 08:38:11 UTC
Is it possible (and desriable) to have a way to perform resource integrity checks on the manifest? Can an SRI hash be put directly into the URL somehow (as a query parameter that IS allowed maybe)? Related to #17 we might want to use `ni:` URIs that translate to an HTTPS resource. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-decade-ni-10#section-4 and the examples later showing how `ni://example.com/sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk` maps to `http://example.com/.well-known/ni/sha-256/f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk` which could be a redirect to: `http://example.com/payments.manifest` and would allow the browser to validate that the content of the file matches the PMI. i.e. The SHA256 hash of the content of `http://example.com/payments.manifest` MUST equal 'f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk' -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/issues/18
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 08:38:11 UTC