Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should well-known identifiers be used for ubiquitous payment methods (#10)

On 2016-05-24 23:04, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote:
> Are there reasons other than reducing the verbosity of payment requests
> for short-names?

in some cases (see RFC 5988 as an example) people like to separate the 
identifier namespace into "well-known" (short names that need to be 
registered and thus can be used safely) and "extension" (full URIs that 
are not supposed to be registered and thus can be used freely and 
openly). that's of course just one possible reason of why people might 
like short names.


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/10#issuecomment-221459472